In Deathloop, the Core i3-350M is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $276 cheaper!
Core i3-350M
- Up to 68% cheaper – $129.94 vs $405.72
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 66% better value in Deathloop – $0.57 vs $1.67/FPS
- Up to 66% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-14700K
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 13 years and 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-350M vs Core i7-14700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
226 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
93%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$405.72
32%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
34%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Core i7-14700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Core i7-14700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
