In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-350M is faster than the Core i7-13700K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $380 cheaper!
Core i3-350M
- Up to 24% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 210 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 75% cheaper – $129.94 vs $509.86
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.61 vs $2.99/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-13700K
- Is 12 years and 8 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 12 years and 8 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-350M vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
170 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
80%
Price, $
$509.86
25%
Value, $/FPS
$2.99/FPS
20%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
