In F1 24, the Core i3-350M is slower than the Core i5-12490F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12490F
- Up to 26% faster in F1 24 – 185 vs 147 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in F1 24
F1 24 FPS Calculator
Core i3-350M vs Core i5-12490F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
147 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
110 FPS
81%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Core i5-12490F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Core i5-12490F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12490F
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12490F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
