In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-350M is faster than the Core i3-14100 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $6 cheaper!
Core i3-350M
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 250 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Up to 5% cheaper – $129.94 vs $136.43
- Up to 5% cheaper
- Up to 18% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.51 vs $0.62/FPS
- Up to 18% better value in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 35 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Is 14 years newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 14 years newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-350M vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
217 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
87%
Price, $
$136.43
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
82%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
