In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-330M is slightly faster than the Xeon X5550. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-330M
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 251 vs 242 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Is 9 months and 9 days newer – Jan 07, 2010 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 9 months and 9 days newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X5550
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Xeon X5550: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
188 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Xeon X5550 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Xeon X5550 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Xeon X5550
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X5550 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
