In Deathloop, the Core i3-330M is slightly faster than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-330M
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 228 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 months and 29 days newer – Jan 07, 2010 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 3 months and 29 days newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
80%
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $189.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
