In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-330M is slightly faster than the Xeon W3550. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-330M
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 213 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 4 months and 29 days newer – Jan 07, 2010 vs Aug 09, 2009
- Is 4 months and 29 days newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3550
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Xeon W3550: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Xeon W3550 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Xeon W3550 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Xeon W3550
Aug 9th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3550 Aug 9th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Aug 9th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
