In Deathloop, the Core i3-330M is slightly faster than the Xeon E5-2420. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-330M
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 228 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2420
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – May 14, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Xeon E5-2420: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Xeon E5-2420 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Xeon E5-2420 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2420
May 14th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2420 May 14th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1356 |
35W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
