In Atomfall, the Core i3-330M is slightly slower than the Core i7-980X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-330M
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-980X
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 months and 7 days newer – Mar 16, 2010 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 months and 7 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i7-980X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
184 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
138 FPS
96%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-980X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-980X Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
