In Atomfall, the Core i3-330M is slightly slower than the Core i7-960. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-330M
- Is 2 months and 18 days newer – Jan 07, 2010 vs Oct 20, 2009
- Is 2 months and 18 days newer
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-960
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i7-960: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
182 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
96%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-960 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-960 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-960 Oct 20th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Oct 20th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
