In F1 22, the Core i3-330M is slightly faster than the Core i7-930 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $116 cheaper!
Core i3-330M
- Up to 3% faster in F1 22 – 386 vs 375 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in F1 22
- Up to 54% cheaper – $98.95 vs $215.00
- Up to 54% cheaper
- Up to 56% better value in F1 22 – $0.25 vs $0.57/FPS
- Up to 56% better value in F1 22
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-930
- Is 1 month and 21 days newer – Feb 28, 2010 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 month and 21 days newer
F1 22 FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
386 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
259 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
375 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
254 FPS
98%
Price, $
$215
46%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
44%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
