In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-330M is faster than the Core i7-8700 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $48 cheaper!
Core i3-330M
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 216 vs 177 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 33% cheaper – $98.95 vs $147.13
- Up to 33% cheaper
- Up to 46% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.45 vs $0.83/FPS
- Up to 46% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i7-8700
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 7 years and 8 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
177 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
133 FPS
82%
Price, $
$147.13
67%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
54%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
