In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-330M is slightly faster than the Core i7-6700T. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $20 more expensive!
Core i3-330M
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 250 vs 228 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in The Last of Us Part I
Core i7-6700T
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 20% cheaper – $79.00 vs $98.95
- Up to 20% cheaper
- Up to 13% better value in The Last of Us Part I – $0.34 vs $0.39/FPS
- Up to 13% better value in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i7-6700T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
187 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
79%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
87%
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
228 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
91%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-6700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-6700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
50%
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
