In Control, the Core i3-330M is slightly slower than the Core i7-4765T. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $400 cheaper!
Core i3-330M
- Up to 80% cheaper – $98.95 vs $498.95
- Up to 80% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in Control – $0.40 vs $2.02/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in Control
Core i7-4765T
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i7-4765T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
244 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
99%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
100%
Price, $
$498.95
19%
Value, $/FPS
$2.02/FPS
20%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-4765T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i7-4765T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
67%
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
