In Atomfall, the Core i3-330M is slightly slower than the Core i5-9600K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $49 cheaper!
Core i3-330M
- Up to 33% cheaper – $98.95 vs $148.08
- Up to 33% cheaper
- Up to 22% better value in Atomfall – $0.54 vs $0.69/FPS
- Up to 22% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Core i5-9600K
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 213 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i5-9600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
182 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
136 FPS
86%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.08
66%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
78%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i5-9600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i5-9600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Core i5-9600K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9600K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
