The Core i3-330M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-7640X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-330M
- Consumes up to 69% less energy – 35 vs 112 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i5-7640X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i5-7640X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i3-330M vs Core i5-7640X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
164
85%
Min 1% FPS
110
86%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-7640X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
194
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, $
$331.32
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.7/FPS
100%
Core i3-330M vs Core i5-7640X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i5-7640X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i5-7640X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.13 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Core i5-7640X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-330M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-7640X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Arrandale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 112 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |