In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-330M is slightly faster than the Core i5-650. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $36 more expensive!
Core i3-330M
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 216 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 36% cheaper – $63.33 vs $98.95
- Up to 36% cheaper
- Up to 31% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.31 vs $0.45/FPS
- Up to 31% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
64%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
69%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
204 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
94%
Price, $
$63.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
80%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
