In Deathloop, the Core i3-330M is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-330M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
227 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
98%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
