In Atomfall, the Core i3-330M is slower than the Core i3-12100. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $91 cheaper!
Core i3-330M
- Up to 48% cheaper – $98.95 vs $189.99
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 36% better value in Atomfall – $0.54 vs $0.84/FPS
- Up to 36% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 35 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i3-12100
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 225 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i3-12100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
183 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
137 FPS
82%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Core i3-12100
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.99
52%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
64%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i3-12100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i3-12100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
22%
Core i3-12100
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12100 Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
