In Deathloop, the Core i3-330M is slightly faster than the Core i3-10100 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $40 cheaper!
Core i3-330M
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 29% cheaper – $98.95 vs $139.00
- Up to 29% cheaper
- Up to 30% better value in Deathloop – $0.44 vs $0.63/FPS
- Up to 30% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-10100
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
219 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$139
71%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
70%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
