The Core i3-3250 is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-3930K, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $190.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-3250
- Up to 68% cheaper – $90.00 vs $280.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 55 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-3930K cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i7-3930K
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Core i3-3250 vs Core i7-3930K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$280
32%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
32%
Core i3-3250 vs Core i7-3930K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3250 vs Core i7-3930K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3250 vs Core i7-3930K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3250
Jun 9th, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
$138.00 | MSRP | $583.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
55 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |