Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3397 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Core i3-3250
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $48.00 vs $309.00
- Up to 83% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i7-13700K - $0.19 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 7% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i3-3250 - 275 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Buy for $309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3250 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |