The Core i3-3250 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-7600K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $44.44 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i3-3250
- Up to 33% cheaper – $90.00 vs $134.44
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 55 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-7600K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i3-3250 vs Core i5-7600K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-7600K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
$134.44
66%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
75%
Core i3-3250 vs Core i5-7600K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3250 vs Core i5-7600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3250 vs Core i5-7600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3250
Jun 9th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i5-7600K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
$138.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
55 W | Power Consumption | 91 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |