Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3676 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 40% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-3240T - 312 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 24 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
312
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$379
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240T | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |