In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-3240 is same performance as the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3240
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Sep 03, 2012 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 55 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3450
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-3240 vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
99%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3240 vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3240 vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3240 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $241.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1156 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
