In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3240 is faster than the Ryzen 5 7600 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $61 cheaper!
Core i3-3240
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 194 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 32% cheaper – $128.99 vs $189.99
- Up to 32% cheaper
- Up to 41% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.66 vs $1.12/FPS
- Up to 41% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Ryzen 5 7600
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 14, 2023 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3240 vs Ryzen 5 7600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
194 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
146 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 7600
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
169 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
87%
Price, $
$189.99
67%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
59%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3240 vs Ryzen 5 7600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3240 vs Ryzen 5 7600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 7600
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3240 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7600 Jan 14th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $229.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM5 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
