In F1 25, the Core i3-3240 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 14% faster in F1 25 – 196 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in F1 25
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
F1 25 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3240 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
172 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
88%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3240 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
