In Ghost of Tsushima, the Core i3-3240 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $371 cheaper!
Core i3-3240
- Up to 74% cheaper – $128.99 vs $499.99
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in Ghost of Tsushima – $1.21 vs $3.08/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in Ghost of Tsushima
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 53% faster in Ghost of Tsushima – 162 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 53% faster in Ghost of Tsushima
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 10 years and 23 days newer
Ghost of Tsushima FPS Calculator
Core i3-3240 vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
106 FPS
65%
Min 1% FPS
71 FPS
59%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
162 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
121 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
25%
Value, $/FPS
$3.08/FPS
39%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3240 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
