In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i3-3240 is slightly faster than the Core i7-13700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3240
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 241 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-13700F
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i3-3240 vs Core i7-13700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i7-13700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i7-13700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3240 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
