In Atomfall, the Core i3-3240 is slower than the Core i5-12600K. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $55 cheaper!
Core i3-3240
- Up to 30% cheaper – $128.99 vs $184.46
- Up to 30% cheaper
- Up to 14% better value in Atomfall – $0.67 vs $0.78/FPS
- Up to 14% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Core i5-12600K
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall – 235 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3240 vs Core i5-12600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
191 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
81%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Core i5-12600K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
235 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
176 FPS
100%
Price, $
$184.46
69%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
86%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i5-12600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i5-12600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12600K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3240 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12600K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $289.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
