In Tom Clancy's The Division 2, the Core i3-3240 is much slower than the Core i3-14100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $20 cheaper!
Core i3-3240
- Up to 14% cheaper – $128.99 vs $149.35
- Up to 14% cheaper
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 55 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 8% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Up to 746% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2 – 110 vs 13 FPS
- Up to 746% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 86% better value in Tom Clancy's The Division 2 – $1.35 vs $9.92/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in Tom Clancy's The Division 2
Tom Clancy's The Division 2 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3240 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
13 FPS
12%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.92/FPS
14%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
110 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
86%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3240 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3240
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3240 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
