In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3227U is slightly faster than the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3227U
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 208 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2013 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 17 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3450
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3227U vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3227U vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3227U vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3227U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3227U Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2013 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $241.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1156 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
