In Ghost of Tsushima, the Core i3-3227U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 60% faster in Ghost of Tsushima – 163 vs 102 FPS
- Up to 60% faster in Ghost of Tsushima
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer
Ghost of Tsushima FPS Calculator
Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
163 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
122 FPS
100%
Price, $
$463.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3227U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3227U Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
