In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-3227U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 94% faster in Battlefield 6 – 120 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 94% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
120 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$291.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3227U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3227U Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
