In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-3227U is slightly slower than the Core i7-4770HQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 17 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i7-4770HQ
- Up to 8% faster in Battlefield 6 – 67 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer – Jul 01, 2014 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 1 year and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3227U vs Core i7-4770HQ: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i7-4770HQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i7-4770HQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3227U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4770HQ
Jul 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3227U Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4770HQ Jul 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Released | Jul 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 47 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 5200 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
