In Atomfall, the Core i3-3227U is slower than the Core i5-14600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 17 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
Core i5-14600K
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3227U vs Core i5-14600K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i5-14600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i5-14600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3227U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14600K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3227U Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14600K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
