In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-3227U is quite a bit slower than the Core i5-13500T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Core i5-13500T
- Up to 68% faster in Battlefield 6 – 106 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 68% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jan 08, 2013
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3227U vs Core i5-13500T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i5-13500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3227U vs Core i5-13500T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3227U
Jan 8th, 2013
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13500T
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3227U Jan 8th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13500T Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 8th, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $232.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
