In Rust, the Core i3-3225 is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $460 cheaper!
Core i3-3225
- Up to 92% cheaper – $40.00 vs $499.99
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in Rust – $0.19 vs $2.15/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 55 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-9900X
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 232 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-3225 vs Core i9-9900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
71%
Price, $
$40
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
232 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
8%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
9%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i9-9900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i9-9900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
16%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3225 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $989.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA2066 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
