In Atomfall, the Core i3-3225 is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3225
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core i9-9900
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 216 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3225 vs Core i9-9900: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$499.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i9-9900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i9-9900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3225 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900 Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $423.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
