In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3225 is faster than the Core i7-9700K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $203 cheaper!
Core i3-3225
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 84% cheaper – $40.00 vs $242.94
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.20 vs $1.41/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 55 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i7-9700K
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3225 vs Core i7-9700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$40
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
172 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
87%
Price, $
$242.94
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
14%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i7-9700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i7-9700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3225 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $385.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
