In Atomfall, the Core i3-3225 is slightly slower than the Core i7-6700T. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $39 cheaper!
Core i3-3225
- Up to 49% cheaper – $40.00 vs $79.00
- Up to 49% cheaper
- Up to 45% better value in Atomfall – $0.21 vs $0.38/FPS
- Up to 45% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-6700T
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 204 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3225 vs Core i7-6700T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
189 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
92%
Price, $
$40
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
50%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
55%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i7-6700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i7-6700T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3225 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-6700T Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 55 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
