In Deathloop, the Core i3-3225 is slightly faster than the Core i7-4765T and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $459 cheaper!
Core i3-3225
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 92% cheaper – $40.00 vs $498.95
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 92% better value in Deathloop – $0.18 vs $2.28/FPS
- Up to 92% better value in Deathloop
Core i7-4765T
- Is 8 months and 28 days newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 8 months and 28 days newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-3225 vs Core i7-4765T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$40
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
218 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$498.95
8%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
8%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i7-4765T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i7-4765T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3225 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 55 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
