In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3225 is faster than the Core i5-14400 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $155 cheaper!
Core i3-3225
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 79% cheaper – $40.00 vs $195.00
- Up to 79% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.20 vs $1.15/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core i5-14400
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3225 vs Core i5-14400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
198 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$40
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
86%
Price, $
$195
20%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
17%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i5-14400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i5-14400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3225 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $221.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
