In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3225 is faster than the Core i5-10600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3225
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 55 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Core i5-10600K
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3225 vs Core i5-10600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
172 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
87%
Price, $
$182.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i5-10600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i5-10600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3225 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
