In Battlefield V, the Core i3-3225 is slightly slower than the Core i3-9100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-3225
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 4% faster in Battlefield V – 229 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Battlefield V
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield V FPS Calculator
Core i3-3225 vs Core i3-9100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3225 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1151 |
55W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
