In Atomfall, the Core i3-3225 is slightly slower than the Core i3-10100. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $60 cheaper!
Core i3-3225
- Up to 60% cheaper – $40.00 vs $99.95
- Up to 60% cheaper
- Up to 55% better value in Atomfall – $0.21 vs $0.47/FPS
- Up to 55% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core i3-10100
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-3225 vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
90%
Price, $
$40
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
40%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
45%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3225 vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3225
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3225 Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
