Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 3500 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Core i3-3220T
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700 - $59.40 vs $127.00
- Up to 28% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 7 5700 - $1.35 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 55% better in Starfield than Core i3-3220T - 68 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6912 minutes ago
Buy for $127 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6912 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3220T | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |