In Rust, the Core i3-3220T is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245K and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $40 cheaper!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 17% cheaper – $189.95 vs $229.89
- Up to 17% cheaper
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245K
- Up to 33% faster in Rust – 279 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 9% better value in Rust – $0.82 vs $0.90/FPS
- Up to 9% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core Ultra 5 245K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
46%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
91%
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
279 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.89
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core Ultra 5 245K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core Ultra 5 245K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
