In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-3220T is faster than the Core Ultra 5 235 and it's also a better value for money, as it's $90 cheaper!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 32% cheaper – $189.95 vs $279.79
- Up to 32% cheaper
- Up to 43% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.94 vs $1.65/FPS
- Up to 43% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 5 235
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 12 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core Ultra 5 235: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
169 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$279.79
67%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
57%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core Ultra 5 235 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core Ultra 5 235 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
14%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 235 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $257.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
