In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-3220T is much slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $263 cheaper!
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 58% cheaper – $189.95 vs $452.68
- Up to 58% cheaper
- Up to 6% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.11 vs $3.32/FPS
- Up to 6% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 123% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 123% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-3220T vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
45%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
45%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.11/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
41%
Value, $/FPS
$3.32/FPS
94%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3220T vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
